Skip to content
GLP-1 Scorecard
Menu

Head-to-head · WeighScore

Oak vs Virta Health

Oak
Graded #42

Higher grade

vs+16.200000000000003
Virta Health
Graded #337

Lower grade

The verdict

Oak takes it — 75.9/100 to 59.7/100.

Oak grades higher on WeighScore, our editorial score across cost value, dose & formulation, clinical oversight, labs & monitoring, fulfillment and contract terms. The cheapest published prices on the board, sold as a package with no membership fee.

We may earn a commission if you start care through some of these links, at no extra cost to you. It never moves the WeighScore, which is the weighted average of the six factors shown for every provider, and what we write about a provider is the same either way. See our disclosure.

Factor by factor

The same six graded dimensions, side by side. See the methodology.

Cost valueOak +51
96
45
Dose & formulationOak +11
62
51
Clinical oversightVirta Health +11
66
77
Labs & monitoringVirta Health +13
58
71
FulfillmentOak +23
88
65
Contract termsOak +33
88
55
Oak · left barVirta Health · right bar

The numbers

MetricOakVirta Health
WeighScore75.9/10059.7/100
GradeCC
Scorecard rank#42#337
SemaglutideFrom $119/moNot disclosed
TirzepatideFrom $185/moNot disclosed
CoverageAll 50 statesCoverage not published
Brand-name accessCompounded onlyCompounded only
Oral / sublingualInjection onlyYes
Oak

Graded #42 · C

Strengths

  • Lowest published prices here — semaglutide from $119/mo, tirzepatide from $185/mo
  • One price across every dosage, so titrating up costs no more
  • No membership or subscription fee, and free shipping
  • All 50 states, offered in Spanish as well as English

Where it loses points

  • Same-day approval with no video call means very little clinical contact before a prescription
  • No published lab or monitoring programme
  • Injection only, and no brand-name lane
  • Sold as packages, so re-ordering is on you
Virta Health

Graded #337 · C

Strengths

  • Offers a Responsible Prescribing track with optimized GLP-1 use
  • Clinically monitored medication off-ramp toward nutrition therapy
  • Nutrition-first model shown to rival GLP-1 weight loss (about 13% at 1 year)
  • Provided at no cost to members through employers and health plans
  • Strong evidence base for diabetes reversal and metabolic health

Where it loses points

  • Primarily a nutrition program; GLP-1s are a secondary track
  • Distributed via employers and health plans, no direct cash-pay
  • Deliberately discourages GLP-1 use for most members
  • GLP-1 access depends on the specific program the plan selects

Also worth a look

Neither is our top-graded pick — CoreAge Rx leads the scorecard

Across all 499 providers, CoreAge Rx grades highest at 91.8/100 (A−). Top of the scorecard: flat transparent pricing, both molecules, nationwide — no teaser-rate games.

Pricing/verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last grading; the WeighScore is our editorial judgment per the methodology. Prices change — confirm on each provider's site. Not medical advice; see our disclosure.

← Back to the scorecard