Skip to content
GLP-1 Scorecard
Menu

Head-to-head · WeighScore

Meto vs Zealthy

Meto
Graded #278

Higher grade

vs+15.299999999999997
Zealthy
Graded #496

Lower grade

The verdict

Meto takes it — 62/100 to 46.7/100.

Meto grades higher on WeighScore, our editorial score across cost value, dose & formulation, clinical oversight, labs & monitoring, fulfillment and contract terms. Meto is an insurance-accepting metabolic telehealth platform offering compounded semaglutide and compounded tirzepatide, prescribed after clinician-ordered lab work.

We may earn a commission if you start care through some of these links, at no extra cost to you. It never moves the WeighScore, which is the weighted average of the six factors shown for every provider, and what we write about a provider is the same either way. See our disclosure.

Factor by factor

The same six graded dimensions, side by side. See the methodology.

Cost valueMeto +19
45
26
Dose & formulationZealthy +24
40
64
Clinical oversightMeto +47
88
41
Labs & monitoringMeto +32
85
53
FulfillmentMeto +1
67
66
Contract termsMeto +14
55
41
Meto · left barZealthy · right bar

The numbers

MetricMetoZealthy
WeighScore62/10046.7/100
GradeCC
Scorecard rank#278#496
SemaglutideNot disclosed$286/mo (starting dose, plus a separate fee, compounded)
TirzepatideNot disclosed$351/mo (starting dose, plus a separate fee, compounded)
CoverageCoverage not published34 states
Brand-name accessCompounded onlyCompounded only
Oral / sublingualInjection onlyInjection only
Meto

Graded #278 · C

Strengths

  • Accepts major insurance (Blue Cross, Anthem, United, Aetna) — most patients pay $0–50 per visit
  • Requires lab work before prescribing GLP-1s; addresses root-cause metabolic drivers
  • Matches patients with endocrinologists and obesity medicine specialists within minutes
  • Offers compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide with board-certified physician oversight
  • Handles all prior-auth paperwork; provider location pages exist for all 50 US states

Where it loses points

  • Medication pricing fully gated behind quiz — no public cash price for sema or tirz
  • Lab panels are a separate out-of-pocket cost ($199–$399) unless covered by insurance
  • No LegitScript certification or named compounding pharmacy found on any public page
  • Company leadership and clinical team not disclosed publicly
  • Self-pay cash pricing exists per site copy but is not published anywhere
Zealthy

Graded #496 · C

Strengths

  • Serves 34 states — meaningful nationwide footprint
  • Asynchronous model removes friction for patients who don't want a video visit
  • Independent licensed prescribers retain full clinical authority

Where it loses points

  • Active Novo Nordisk false-advertising lawsuit alleging trademark infringement and marketing compounded drugs as FDA-approved alternatives
  • Active DOJ/FTC enforcement alleging undisclosed subscription terms, locked cancellation, and unauthorized health-data sharing
  • Founder previously ran Cerebral, which settled with the FTC in 2024 over similar deceptive practices
  • Recently rebranded to Gronk Inc. amid active enforcement
  • FDA issued this company a warning letter dated 1 September 2025; the letter is public in FDA's warning-letter database

Also worth a look

Neither is our top-graded pick — CoreAge Rx leads the scorecard

Across all 499 providers, CoreAge Rx grades highest at 91.8/100 (A−). Top of the scorecard: flat transparent pricing, both molecules, nationwide — no teaser-rate games.

Pricing/verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last grading; the WeighScore is our editorial judgment per the methodology. Prices change — confirm on each provider's site. Not medical advice; see our disclosure.

← Back to the scorecard