Skip to content
GLP-1 Scorecard
Menu

Head-to-head · WeighScore

Meto vs Nava Health

Meto
Graded #278

Higher grade

vs+1.3999999999999986
Nava Health
Graded #319

Lower grade

The verdict

Meto takes it — 62/100 to 60.6/100, but only just.

Meto grades higher on WeighScore, our editorial score across cost value, dose & formulation, clinical oversight, labs & monitoring, fulfillment and contract terms. Meto is an insurance-accepting metabolic telehealth platform offering compounded semaglutide and compounded tirzepatide, prescribed after clinician-ordered lab work. Nava Health is close behind and may still be the better fit — see the factor split below.

We may earn a commission if you start care through some of these links, at no extra cost to you. It never moves the WeighScore, which is the weighted average of the six factors shown for every provider, and what we write about a provider is the same either way. See our disclosure.

Factor by factor

The same six graded dimensions, side by side. See the methodology.

Cost valueEven
45
45
Dose & formulationNava Health +13
40
53
Clinical oversightMeto +8
88
80
Labs & monitoringMeto +12
85
73
FulfillmentMeto +5
67
62
Contract termsEven
55
55
Meto · left barNava Health · right bar

The numbers

MetricMetoNava Health
WeighScore62/10060.6/100
GradeCC
Scorecard rank#278#319
SemaglutideNot disclosedNot disclosed
TirzepatideNot disclosedNot disclosed
CoverageCoverage not publishedCoverage not published
Brand-name accessCompounded onlyYes
Oral / sublingualInjection onlyInjection only
Meto

Graded #278 · C

Strengths

  • Accepts major insurance (Blue Cross, Anthem, United, Aetna) — most patients pay $0–50 per visit
  • Requires lab work before prescribing GLP-1s; addresses root-cause metabolic drivers
  • Matches patients with endocrinologists and obesity medicine specialists within minutes
  • Offers compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide with board-certified physician oversight
  • Handles all prior-auth paperwork; provider location pages exist for all 50 US states

Where it loses points

  • Medication pricing fully gated behind quiz — no public cash price for sema or tirz
  • Lab panels are a separate out-of-pocket cost ($199–$399) unless covered by insurance
  • No LegitScript certification or named compounding pharmacy found on any public page
  • Company leadership and clinical team not disclosed publicly
  • Self-pay cash pricing exists per site copy but is not published anywhere
Nava Health

Graded #319 · C

Strengths

  • Integrative functional-medicine approach with advanced lab testing
  • Both telemedicine and in-person options
  • Board-certified MDs, DOs, NPs, PAs, and nutritionists
  • Offers both brand and compounded GLP-1 formulations
  • Financing and membership plans available

Where it loses points

  • No published GLP-1 medication pricing online
  • Consultation plus lab work adds to total cost
  • Bundled integrative model costs more than medication-only platforms
  • State availability for telehealth not clearly listed

Also worth a look

Neither is our top-graded pick — CoreAge Rx leads the scorecard

Across all 499 providers, CoreAge Rx grades highest at 91.8/100 (A−). Top of the scorecard: flat transparent pricing, both molecules, nationwide — no teaser-rate games.

Pricing/verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last grading; the WeighScore is our editorial judgment per the methodology. Prices change — confirm on each provider's site. Not medical advice; see our disclosure.

← Back to the scorecard