Skip to content
GLP-1 Scorecard
Menu

Head-to-head · WeighScore

Medivive vs Virta Health

Medivive
Graded #335

Level

vs
Virta Health
Graded #336

Level

The verdict

Too close to call — both grade 59.7/100 (C).

Medivive and Virta Health land on the same WeighScore, so neither clears the other on our six graded dimensions. Medivive sits one line higher on the board (#335 vs #336) on the underlying tiebreak, but it's a genuine coin-flip — pick on the factors and prices that matter most to you below.

We may earn a commission if you start care through some of these links, at no extra cost to you. It never moves the WeighScore, which is the weighted average of the six factors shown for every provider, and what we write about a provider is the same either way. See our disclosure.

Factor by factor

The same six graded dimensions, side by side. See the methodology.

Cost valueMedivive +26
71
45
Dose & formulationVirta Health +11
40
51
Clinical oversightVirta Health +14
63
77
Labs & monitoringVirta Health +7
64
71
FulfillmentVirta Health +4
61
65
Contract termsEven
55
55
Medivive · left barVirta Health · right bar

The numbers

MetricMediviveVirta Health
WeighScore59.7/10059.7/100
GradeCC
Scorecard rank#335#336
SemaglutideNot disclosedNot disclosed
TirzepatideNot disclosedNot disclosed
CoverageCoverage not publishedCoverage not published
Brand-name accessCompounded onlyCompounded only
Oral / sublingualInjection onlyYes
Medivive

Graded #335 · C

Strengths

  • Compounded semaglutide and tirzepatide with providers licensed in all 50 states
  • No insurance required; one-stop for GLP-1 plus TRT, NAD+ and longevity care
  • Medication filled through a licensed pharmacy

Where it loses points

  • Monthly pricing not published; disclosed only after an AI intake
  • No legal entity or named pharmacy disclosed
  • Service states are not individually listed
Virta Health

Graded #336 · C

Strengths

  • Offers a Responsible Prescribing track with optimized GLP-1 use
  • Clinically monitored medication off-ramp toward nutrition therapy
  • Nutrition-first model shown to rival GLP-1 weight loss (about 13% at 1 year)
  • Provided at no cost to members through employers and health plans
  • Strong evidence base for diabetes reversal and metabolic health

Where it loses points

  • Primarily a nutrition program; GLP-1s are a secondary track
  • Distributed via employers and health plans, no direct cash-pay
  • Deliberately discourages GLP-1 use for most members
  • GLP-1 access depends on the specific program the plan selects

Also worth a look

Neither is our top-graded pick — CoreAge Rx leads the scorecard

Across all 499 providers, CoreAge Rx grades highest at 91.8/100 (A−). Top of the scorecard: flat transparent pricing, both molecules, nationwide — no teaser-rate games.

Pricing/verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last grading; the WeighScore is our editorial judgment per the methodology. Prices change — confirm on each provider's site. Not medical advice; see our disclosure.

← Back to the scorecard