Skip to content
GLP-1 Scorecard
Menu

Head-to-head · WeighScore

eMed vs Zealthy

eMed
Graded #399

Higher grade

vs+10.699999999999996
Zealthy
Graded #496

Lower grade

The verdict

eMed takes it — 57.4/100 to 46.7/100.

eMed grades higher on WeighScore, our editorial score across cost value, dose & formulation, clinical oversight, labs & monitoring, fulfillment and contract terms. eMed is a digital health platform best known for at-home diagnostics that now runs a clinician-supported GLP-1 weight management program.

We may earn a commission if you start care through some of these links, at no extra cost to you. It never moves the WeighScore, which is the weighted average of the six factors shown for every provider, and what we write about a provider is the same either way. See our disclosure.

Factor by factor

The same six graded dimensions, side by side. See the methodology.

Cost valueeMed +19
45
26
Dose & formulationZealthy +24
40
64
Clinical oversighteMed +42
83
41
Labs & monitoringeMed +12
65
53
FulfillmentZealthy +4
62
66
Contract termseMed +14
55
41
eMed · left barZealthy · right bar

The numbers

MetriceMedZealthy
WeighScore57.4/10046.7/100
GradeCC
Scorecard rank#399#496
SemaglutideNot disclosed$286/mo (starting dose, plus a separate fee, compounded)
TirzepatideNot disclosed$351/mo (starting dose, plus a separate fee, compounded)
CoverageCoverage not published34 states
Brand-name accessCompounded onlyCompounded only
Oral / sublingualInjection onlyInjection only
eMed

Graded #399 · C

Strengths

  • Prescribes FDA-approved branded GLP-1s (semaglutide and tirzepatide)
  • At-home blood collection makes lab work convenient
  • Clinician review and ongoing side-effect plus adherence support
  • Works with CVS Caremark so eligible employees can buy through benefits
  • Established digital health company with national scale

Where it loses points

  • Distributed mainly via employers, with limited direct cash-pay access
  • No public transparent monthly price for individuals
  • Eligibility and subsidy depend on what the employer chooses to cover
  • Best suited to workforces, not casual self-pay shoppers
Zealthy

Graded #496 · C

Strengths

  • Serves 34 states — meaningful nationwide footprint
  • Asynchronous model removes friction for patients who don't want a video visit
  • Independent licensed prescribers retain full clinical authority

Where it loses points

  • Active Novo Nordisk false-advertising lawsuit alleging trademark infringement and marketing compounded drugs as FDA-approved alternatives
  • Active DOJ/FTC enforcement alleging undisclosed subscription terms, locked cancellation, and unauthorized health-data sharing
  • Founder previously ran Cerebral, which settled with the FTC in 2024 over similar deceptive practices
  • Recently rebranded to Gronk Inc. amid active enforcement
  • FDA issued this company a warning letter dated 1 September 2025; the letter is public in FDA's warning-letter database

Also worth a look

Neither is our top-graded pick — CoreAge Rx leads the scorecard

Across all 499 providers, CoreAge Rx grades highest at 91.8/100 (A−). Top of the scorecard: flat transparent pricing, both molecules, nationwide — no teaser-rate games.

Pricing/verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last grading; the WeighScore is our editorial judgment per the methodology. Prices change — confirm on each provider's site. Not medical advice; see our disclosure.

← Back to the scorecard