Skip to content
GLP-1 Scorecard
Menu

Head-to-head · WeighScore

Basal Health vs eMed

Basal Health
Graded #494

Lower grade

vs+9.699999999999996
eMed
Graded #399

Higher grade

The verdict

eMed takes it — 57.4/100 to 47.7/100.

eMed grades higher on WeighScore, our editorial score across cost value, dose & formulation, clinical oversight, labs & monitoring, fulfillment and contract terms. eMed is a digital health platform best known for at-home diagnostics that now runs a clinician-supported GLP-1 weight management program.

We may earn a commission if you start care through some of these links, at no extra cost to you. It never moves the WeighScore, which is the weighted average of the six factors shown for every provider, and what we write about a provider is the same either way. See our disclosure.

Factor by factor

The same six graded dimensions, side by side. See the methodology.

Cost valueEven
45
45
Dose & formulationEven
40
40
Clinical oversighteMed +35
48
83
Labs & monitoringeMed +15
50
65
FulfillmenteMed +4
58
62
Contract termsEven
55
55
Basal Health · left bareMed · right bar

The numbers

MetricBasal HealtheMed
WeighScore47.7/10057.4/100
GradeCC
Scorecard rank#494#399
SemaglutideNot disclosedNot disclosed
TirzepatideNot disclosedNot disclosed
CoverageAll 50 statesCoverage not published
Brand-name accessCompounded onlyCompounded only
Oral / sublingualInjection onlyInjection only
Basal Health

Graded #494 · C

Strengths

  • Stated nationwide coverage (50 states + DC)
  • Metabolic-framework positioning rather than single-product
  • Clinician-supervised dosing rather than a fixed protocol
  • Adaptive monitoring approach

Where it loses points

  • No pricing shown publicly — you must complete intake to see cost
  • Compounding pharmacy partner not named
  • GLP-1 molecules not specified (semaglutide vs tirzepatide vs oral)
  • No LegitScript badge visible on the homepage
  • No FDA compounded-medication disclaimer on the pages reviewed
eMed

Graded #399 · C

Strengths

  • Prescribes FDA-approved branded GLP-1s (semaglutide and tirzepatide)
  • At-home blood collection makes lab work convenient
  • Clinician review and ongoing side-effect plus adherence support
  • Works with CVS Caremark so eligible employees can buy through benefits
  • Established digital health company with national scale

Where it loses points

  • Distributed mainly via employers, with limited direct cash-pay access
  • No public transparent monthly price for individuals
  • Eligibility and subsidy depend on what the employer chooses to cover
  • Best suited to workforces, not casual self-pay shoppers

Also worth a look

Neither is our top-graded pick — CoreAge Rx leads the scorecard

Across all 499 providers, CoreAge Rx grades highest at 91.8/100 (A−). Top of the scorecard: flat transparent pricing, both molecules, nationwide — no teaser-rate games.

Pricing/verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last grading; the WeighScore is our editorial judgment per the methodology. Prices change — confirm on each provider's site. Not medical advice; see our disclosure.

← Back to the scorecard