Skip to content
GLP-1 Scorecard
Menu

Head-to-head · WeighScore

Ro vs Mint Med

Ro
Graded #24Editorial

Lower grade

vs+6
Mint Med
Graded #15Editorial

Higher grade

The verdict

Mint Med takes it — 84/100 to 78/100.

Mint Med grades higher on WeighScore, our editorial score across cost value, dose & formulation, clinical oversight, labs & monitoring, fulfillment and contract terms. Low both-molecule pricing ($117/$159) and verified — but only 36 states.

Both are editorial reviews with no commercial relationship.

Factor by factor

The same six graded dimensions, side by side. See the methodology.

Cost valueMint Med +22
68
90
Dose & formulationRo +6
86
80
Clinical oversightRo +1
86
85
Labs & monitoringMint Med +1
82
83
FulfillmentRo +2
84
82
Contract termsMint Med +6
80
86
Ro · left barMint Med · right bar

The numbers

MetricRoMint Med
WeighScore78/10084/100
GradeC+B
Scorecard rank#24#15
SemaglutideNot disclosed$117/mo
TirzepatideNot disclosed$159/mo
CoverageMulti-state36 states
Brand-name accessYesCompounded only
Oral / sublingualYesInjection only
RelationshipEditorialEditorial
Ro

Graded #24 · C+

Strengths

  • Brand-name access + insurance support
  • Oral options
  • Well-funded platform

Where it loses points

  • Does not disclose compounded pricing up front
  • Premium positioning
Mint Med

Graded #15 · B

Strengths

  • $117 sema / $159 tirz
  • LegitScript-verified
  • Both molecules

Where it loses points

  • Only 36 states
  • Injection-only
  • Monitoring detail sparse

Also worth a look

Neither is our top-graded pick — CoreAge Rx leads the scorecard

Across all 25 providers, CoreAge Rx grades highest at 94/100 (A). Top of the scorecard: flat transparent pricing, both molecules, nationwide — no teaser-rate games.

Pricing/verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last grading; the WeighScore is our editorial judgment per the methodology. Prices change — confirm on each provider's site. Not medical advice; see our disclosure.

← Back to the scorecard