Skip to content
GLP-1 Scorecard
Menu

Head-to-head · WeighScore

Mint Med vs Ro

Mint Med
Graded #15Editorial

Higher grade

vs+6
Ro
Graded #24Editorial

Lower grade

The verdict

Mint Med takes it — 84/100 to 78/100.

Mint Med grades higher on WeighScore, our editorial score across cost value, dose & formulation, clinical oversight, labs & monitoring, fulfillment and contract terms. Low both-molecule pricing ($117/$159) and verified — but only 36 states.

Both are editorial reviews with no commercial relationship.

Factor by factor

The same six graded dimensions, side by side. See the methodology.

Cost valueMint Med +22
90
68
Dose & formulationRo +6
80
86
Clinical oversightRo +1
85
86
Labs & monitoringMint Med +1
83
82
FulfillmentRo +2
82
84
Contract termsMint Med +6
86
80
Mint Med · left barRo · right bar

The numbers

MetricMint MedRo
WeighScore84/10078/100
GradeBC+
Scorecard rank#15#24
Semaglutide$117/moNot disclosed
Tirzepatide$159/moNot disclosed
Coverage36 statesMulti-state
Brand-name accessCompounded onlyYes
Oral / sublingualInjection onlyYes
RelationshipEditorialEditorial
Mint Med

Graded #15 · B

Strengths

  • $117 sema / $159 tirz
  • LegitScript-verified
  • Both molecules

Where it loses points

  • Only 36 states
  • Injection-only
  • Monitoring detail sparse
Ro

Graded #24 · C+

Strengths

  • Brand-name access + insurance support
  • Oral options
  • Well-funded platform

Where it loses points

  • Does not disclose compounded pricing up front
  • Premium positioning

Also worth a look

Neither is our top-graded pick — CoreAge Rx leads the scorecard

Across all 25 providers, CoreAge Rx grades highest at 94/100 (A). Top of the scorecard: flat transparent pricing, both molecules, nationwide — no teaser-rate games.

Pricing/verification reflect each provider's public disclosures at last grading; the WeighScore is our editorial judgment per the methodology. Prices change — confirm on each provider's site. Not medical advice; see our disclosure.

← Back to the scorecard